This blog post contains one small analogy for explaining family-wise error to your students. I was making French toast for dinner the other night.  While I was measuring out cinnamon, I realized using one tablespoon instead of three teaspoons to avoid measuring errors is sort of like using a one-way ANOVA with three levels instead of doing three  t  tests to avoid Type I error.   Stick with me here. If I were to use three teaspoons to measure out an ingredient, there is a chance I could make a mistake three times. Three opportunities for air pockets. Three opportunities to not perfectly level out my ingredient. Meanwhile, if I just use one tablespoon, I will only risk the error associated with using a measuring spoon once.  Similarly, every time we use NHST, we accept 5% Type I error (well, if you are a psychologist and using the 5% gold standard, but I digress). Using three tests ( t tests) when we could use one (ANOVA) will increase the risk of a false positi...

This YouGov data asked Americans to rate how much they enjoy a variety of summer activities. They graphed out the percentage of people, divided by demographics, who indicated that they like or love a summer activity. One of the demographics they used was age. Which makes me feel seen, and I can already imagine how I will poke fun at myself, a 46-year-old who hates outdoor sports. More  pedagogically, I can use this data when introducing paired  t -tests. Specifically, I can get them to ponder this data and think about why  the age differences exist.   Here is the data visualization for activities where there is a big age gap in enjoyment: Here is the data visualization for activities where there is not a big age difference: I think they really missed out by not including birdwatching on this list. I'm 46 and I hecking love it.  I could also see this as an example in a Developmental or Psychology of Aging course. What is driving the differences between older...

This summer, the Psi Chi Journal of Psychology Research published  Rouse, Russel, and Campbell's Beyond the textbook: Psi Chi Journal articles in introductory psychology courses. It is a curated list of paywall-free Psi Chi articles, mostly with student co-authors, that are peer-reviewed and of an appropriate writing level and length to use in an Introduction to Psychology course. The authors provide the following information for each of the articles: In addition to being appropriate for Into Psych, these articles are also perfect for Intro Stats. In my classes, I emphasize the ability to read and write simple result sections. One way I would review this skill is by showing my students Results sections from published research and asking them to identify the test statistics, effect size, and other relevant information. This selection of articles features clear and concise results sections for t -tests, ANOVA, factorial ANOVA, regression, and correlation. I created a spreadsheet...

Many thanks to Dr. Sara Appleby for sharing this data with me!! I really enjoy silly data, like this  one from Jayson Jenks, writing for  The Athletic,  which shows how many Uncrustables each team eats per  week. Well, data from the teams that elected to participate and/or didn't make their own PB and Js. The whole article is fun, so give it a read. It makes sense that hungry athletes would go for a quick, calorie-dense, nostalgic snack containing protein.  Here is the data visualization:  Damn, Denver.  I entered this data into a spreadsheet for all of us. Spoiler alert: The number of Uncrustables eaten per week does not vary by league (independent t -test example), and the number of wins in 2023 does not correlate with the number of Uncrustables eaten per week in 2023 (correlation/regression example). Also, for my own curiosity, I re-ran the data after deleting Denver, and it wasn't enough of a difference to achieve significance.  

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com : https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. T-tests : The is a sequel/has a sequel data can be used to perform a ...