Skip to main content

Another recent publication with lots of Psych Stats-friendly data analysis

Alright, kismet, coincidence, I don't know. Still, I'm noticing all of these recent and good scientific articles contain the types of statistical analyses we typically teach in Psych Stats.

Like this article:


Hatano, A., Ogulmus, C., Shigemasu, H., & Murayama, K. (2022). Thinking about thinking: People underestimate how enjoyable and engaging just waiting is. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001255


TL;DR: People think they won't enjoy being alone with their thoughts. BUT THEY DO, as the authors demonstrated throughout five experiments. And those experiments contained a bunch of t-tests (and open data). There are even a couple of ANOVAs in there. 
This is a fine example of how to flesh out a hypothesis using a multi-study design. And it is a round-about way of making our students (and ourselves) reflect on how we feel about boredom, alone time, and technology.

It also contains some very effective data visualization (and also some effective tables):

A data visualization for Experiment 5, featuring error bars, violin plots, and participant-by-participant plotting.
Will you look at that? A simple research design, with a simple t-test, but visualized very well to demonstrate variability. I feel like these participant-by-participant level illustrations are more honest.


A table containing findings from Study 3 of the experiment.
Maybe data viz. isn't your thing, or what you are teaching a bunch of junior statisticians? No problem, there are also several great tables in this research.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Leo DiCaprio Romantic Age Gap Data: UPDATE

Does anyone else teach correlation and regression together at the end of the semester? Here is a treat for you: Updated data on Leonardo DiCaprio, his age, and his romantic partner's age when they started dating. A few years ago, there was a dust-up when a clever Redditor r/TrustLittleBrother realized that DiCaprio had never dated anyone over 25. I blogged about this when it happened. But the old data was from 2022. Inspired by this sleuthing,  I created a wee data set, including up-to-date information on his current relationship with Vittoria Ceretti, so your students can suss out the patterns that exist in this data.

If your students get the joke, they get statistics.

Gleaned from multiple sources (FB, Pinterest, Twitter, none of these belong to me, etc.). Remember, if your students can explain why a stats funny is funny, they are demonstrating statistical knowledge. I like to ask students to explain the humor in such examples for extra credit points (see below for an example from my FA14 final exam). Using xkcd.com for bonus points/assessing if students understand that correlation =/= causation What are the numerical thresholds for probability?  How does this refer to alpha? What type of error is being described, Type I or Type II? What measure of central tendency is being described? Dilbert: http://search.dilbert.com/comic/Kill%20Anyone Sampling, CLT http://foulmouthedbaker.com/2013/10/03/graphs-belong-on-cakes/ Because control vs. sample, standard deviations, normal curves. Also,"skewed" pun. If you go to the original website , the story behind this cakes has to do w...