Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label truncated y-axis

A new way to goof with a y-axis.

My textbook has a feature in every chapter: Dirty Data Alerts. It warns students about ways that data can be manipulated without straight-up lying. I have one Dirty Data Alert dedicated to manipulated  y- axes . Like, truncated y -axes. Because that is the way you manipulate a y -axis, right? RIGHT?! Oh, no, there is a new way to manipulate them without lying. Check out this example, pointed out by @SarahStarberry. Here, the y-axis measures the version number. That's all. Not how good the tool is, or how often it is being used. Just the version number. Like...just wait until I come out with JessChattyTalkTalkBot 8.0 and I destroy all existing competition. If this idea was helpful, you'll probably enjoy my textbook, Psychological Statistics for Everyone . It's basically this blog, but organized into a semester.

Andi Putt's infographics on autism prevalence demonstrate y-axis truncation and the surveillance effect.

This example illustrates how better assessment has likely increased in autism diagnoses (as opposed to the increase being due to vaccines or hysterical parents). It does a good job of illustrating truncated y-axes and the surveillance effect. It also reminds our psychology majors that we have many professional allies and colleagues outside of psychology. Like speech language pathologists.  I found these examples (see below) on Facebook from speech-language pathologist/excellent science communicator  Mrs. Speechie P.   AKA Andi Putt. How to use in class: 1. Truncated y-axis I like how she mentions that truncated y axes can be a scare tactic. I also like that she shows there are still relatively few in the total population. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1327073175898079&set=a.463959318876140 On this theme, she shared a second image that does a really good job of showing how proper diagnosis isn't the same thing as fake/inflated diagnoses (a common argument in ant...

Truncated Y-axis, but with female celebrities.

Why did I find this after my textbook was published? Damn it. I have a whole section about how Y-axis manipulation can make small differences look huge and then...I find this. Damn it. Source:   https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisugly/comments/1hjr01o/height_of_female_popstars/