Posts

Bad data viz: The White House and a rogue y-axis

on
0

Ritchie and Weinersmith, explaining what is wrong with science.

on
0

Data controversies: A primer

on
0

The Knot's Real Wedding Study 2017

on
0

Geckoboard's "Data fallacies to avoid"

on
0

Stein's "Troubling History In Medical Research Still Fresh For Black Americans"

on
0

Compound Interest's "A Rought Guide to Spotting Bad Science"

on
0

Domonoske's "50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat"

on
0

APA's "How to Be A Wise Consumer of Psychological Research"

on
0

Brenner's "These Hilariously Bad Graphs Are More Confusing Than Helpful"

on
0

Harris' "Reviews Of Medical Studies May Be Tainted By Funders' Influence"

on
0

Everything is fucked: The syllabus, by Sanjay Srivastava (with links to articles)

on
0

Carroll's "Sorry, There’s Nothing Magical About Breakfast"

on
0

Weinberg's "How One Study Produced a Bunch of Untrue Headlines About Tattoos Strengthening Your Immune System"

on
0

Science Friday's "Spot the real hypothesis"

on
0

Climate change deniers misrepresent data and get called out

on
0

How NOT to interpret confidence intervals/margins of error: Feel the Bern edition

on
0

Aschwanden's "Science is broken, it is just a hell of a lot harder than we give it credit for"

on
0

Mersereau's "Wunderground Uses Fox News Graphing Technique to Boast Forecast Skills"

on
0

One article (Kramer, Guillory, & Hancock, 2014), three stats/research methodology lessons

on
2