TL;DR: Birds fly away from men a bit sooner than they fly away from women. Full stop. Here is the  original article,  and here is a write-up from  Nautilus . I love bird research. I'll get into why below. For now, let me show you how to use this example to teach three different lessons in a stats class. 1. Independent t test example with a data set The researchers shared their data. The researchers didn't analyze this data with a t test. But they did share this data visualization that looks a whole lot like one: Damn, I love the new trend of the box/violin/jitter plot. FYI: Researcher gender/the IV is labeled "gender," and how far the birds were before they flew away/the DV is labeled "FID" (flight initiation distance). Also, I love this example because the data violate the assumption of equal variance and provide a case for discussing Welch's test. 2. Conceptual example for Factorial ANOVA This example pairs well with a  previous blog post  featuring ...

This blog post contains one small analogy for explaining family-wise error to your students. I was making French toast for dinner the other night.  While I was measuring out cinnamon, I realized using one tablespoon instead of three teaspoons to avoid measuring errors is sort of like using a one-way ANOVA with three levels instead of doing three  t  tests to avoid Type I error.   Stick with me here. If I were to use three teaspoons to measure out an ingredient, there is a chance I could make a mistake three times. Three opportunities for air pockets. Three opportunities to not perfectly level out my ingredient. Meanwhile, if I just use one tablespoon, I will only risk the error associated with using a measuring spoon once.  Similarly, every time we use NHST, we accept 5% Type I error (well, if you are a psychologist and using the 5% gold standard, but I digress). Using three tests ( t tests) when we could use one (ANOVA) will increase the risk of a false positi...