Skip to main content

Understanding children's heart surgery outcomes

Good data should inform our decisions. Even a really stressful decision. This site demonstrates this beautifully by providing UK pediatric hospital survival rates to aid the parents of children undergoing heart surgery.

The information is translated for laypeople. They present statistical ideas that you and your students have heard of but without a lot of statistical jargon. The data is also explained very clearly. For example, they present detailed hospital survival rates, which include survival ranges:



So, it contains data from a given period. It includes the actual mortality rate and a range likely to have a valid mortality rate. So, essentially, they are confidence intervals but not precisely confidence intervals.

In addition to this more traditional presentation of the data, the survival ranges are explained in greater detail in a video. I think this video is helpful because it describes the distribution of the sample mean and how to use them to estimate actual survival rates.


Examples for the classroom:

-Sample v. population: A 30-day survival sample rate is just a sample and does not necessarily reflect the True outcome data.
-Standard Error: They describe that smaller hospitals with fewer surgeries have more significant variability in survival rates than larger hospitals with more surgeries. 
Variability: They explain that the data contains variability because all patients have different pre-existing conditions/personal odds of survival.
-Confidence intervals-ish: When they describe a given survival rate, they use that within the context of that hospital's predicted range. These "predicted ranges" are confidence intervals. They never call them confidence intervals because that phrase means nothing to a layperson.
-When computing the predicted range, they create multiple models of possible samples that could have been collected. So the sampling distribution of the sample mean.
-The blue bar is the 95th percentile. The gray bar is the 99.8th percentile.
-Again, data shouldn't be collected and left on a shelf or in a difficult-to-follow medical journal. It should be shared with the people who need it the most to make an informed decision about their child's health.

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Leo DiCaprio Romantic Age Gap Data: UPDATE

Does anyone else teach correlation and regression together at the end of the semester? Here is a treat for you: Updated data on Leonardo DiCaprio, his age, and his romantic partner's age when they started dating. A few years ago, there was a dust-up when a clever Redditor r/TrustLittleBrother realized that DiCaprio had never dated anyone over 25. I blogged about this when it happened. But the old data was from 2022. Inspired by this sleuthing,  I created a wee data set, including up-to-date information on his current relationship with Vittoria Ceretti, so your students can suss out the patterns that exist in this data.

Tyler Vigen's Spurious Correlations

Tyler Vigen has has created  a long list of easy-to-paste-into-a-powerpoint graphs that illustrate that correlation does not equal causation. For instance, while per capita consumption of cheese and number of people who die by become tangled in their bed sheets may have a strong relationship (r = 0.947091), no one is saying that cheese consumption leads to bed sheet-related death. Although, you could pose The Third Variable question to your students for some of these relationships). Property of Tyler Vigens, http://i.imgur.com/OfQYQW8.png Vigen has also provided a menu of frequently used variables (deaths by tripping, sunlight by state) to help you look for specific examples. This portion is interactive, as you and your students can generate your own graphs. Below, I generated a graph of marriage rates in Pennsylvania and consumption of high fructose corn syrup. Generated at http://www.tylervigen.com/