Skip to main content

The Pudding's Colorism

Malaika Handa, Amber Thomas, and Jan Diehn created a beautiful, interactive website, Colorism in High Fashion. It used machine learning to investigate "colorism" at Vogue magazine. Specifically, it delves into the differences, over time, in cover model color but also how lighting and photoshopping can change the color of the same woman's skin, depending on the photo.

There are soooo many ways to use this in class, ranging from machine learning, how machine learning can refine old psychology methodology, to variability and within/between-group differences. Read on:

1. I'm a social psychologist. Most of us who teach social psychology have encountered research that uses magazine cover models as a proxy for what our culture emphasizes and values (1, 2, 3). Here, Malaika Handa, Amber Thomas, and Jan Diehn apply this methodology to Vogue magazine covers. And they take this methodology into the age of machine learning by using k-means cluster and pixels to determine the skin color of models using.

The screenshots below demonstrate the process in a way even a noob can understand (for more on clustering, I recommend this piece by Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)






2. K-means clustering, featuring an easy to follow example couched in psychology-relevant research

3. Variability. Skin tone becomes more varied over the passage of time. NOTE: I could only view this portion of the website via Internet Explorer (?!).


4. False positives and double-checking your data! Handa trained her software to find faces. There were false positives, as she illustrated on Twitter.

AND she addressed this in the Methods section.


5. Good science communication. Even if you don't understand statistics or machine learning, you can follow this article. When it comes to science and data communication, this isn't always the case.

6. As technology changes, so does research methodology. In order to use magazine cover models as data, researchers (let's face it, RAs) used to individually rate and code magazine cover models. Now, we can teach computers to do so.

7. Within and between group differences:

Color changes over time (between groups, by year):



Color changes just for one woman, based on lighing, airbrushing, etc. (within-group, by woman. Or, by queen, as in this example featuring Rhianna):




Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Leo DiCaprio Romantic Age Gap Data: UPDATE

Does anyone else teach correlation and regression together at the end of the semester? Here is a treat for you: Updated data on Leonardo DiCaprio, his age, and his romantic partner's age when they started dating. A few years ago, there was a dust-up when a clever Redditor r/TrustLittleBrother realized that DiCaprio had never dated anyone over 25. I blogged about this when it happened. But the old data was from 2022. Inspired by this sleuthing,  I created a wee data set, including up-to-date information on his current relationship with Vittoria Ceretti, so your students can suss out the patterns that exist in this data.

Tyler Vigen's Spurious Correlations

Tyler Vigen has has created  a long list of easy-to-paste-into-a-powerpoint graphs that illustrate that correlation does not equal causation. For instance, while per capita consumption of cheese and number of people who die by become tangled in their bed sheets may have a strong relationship (r = 0.947091), no one is saying that cheese consumption leads to bed sheet-related death. Although, you could pose The Third Variable question to your students for some of these relationships). Property of Tyler Vigens, http://i.imgur.com/OfQYQW8.png Vigen has also provided a menu of frequently used variables (deaths by tripping, sunlight by state) to help you look for specific examples. This portion is interactive, as you and your students can generate your own graphs. Below, I generated a graph of marriage rates in Pennsylvania and consumption of high fructose corn syrup. Generated at http://www.tylervigen.com/