Skip to main content

How to unsuccessfully defend your brand using crap data: A primer

As I write this blog post, Francis Haugen testifies on Capitol Hill and sheds light on some of Facebook's shady practices. TL;DR- Facebook realizes that its practices are support terrorism. 

This led to a public relations blitz from Facebook, including Monika Bickert, who appeared on CNN. Of particular relevance is repeated reference made to an Instagram survey of 40 teens (here is the documentation I was able to find).

I saw this tweet from Asha Rangappa Reaction about one of those interviews:

https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1445487820580081674


This example packs a lot of punch. It is a good one for the youths because it is about social media. And if you are a fellow psychologist who teaches statistics, this is an excellent example since it discusses user affect. Here are some takeaways that you could use in class:

Sampling Error

In my classes, we usually discuss how sampling error occurs due to imperfect samples to estimate whole populations. And sometimes sampling error feels...a bit less accidental like in this example, which drew upon 40 girls in London and Los Angeles.

Peer review

In the interview, the FB representative admitted that the data was not peer-reviewed. So who gave their stamp of approval? A bunch of suits at FB, not a group of objective scientists. Which could lead to a discussion about...

Conflict of Interest

Like...FB is defending itself with one tiny study instead of looking at the larger body of research about the ill effects of Facebook (LMGTFY: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C39&q=negative+side+effects+of+facebook&btnG=).

If you are teaching a research methods class, this discussion could THEN lead into a class activity in which you, as your students, 

"What research methodology COULD figure out if social media use hurt users?"

Spoiler: If you search for "negative side effects of Facebook" in Google Scholar, you get almost 1.5 million hits (LMGTFY: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C39&q=negative+side+effects+of+facebook&btnG=)

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...
Read more

Leo DiCaprio Romantic Age Gap Data: UPDATE

Does anyone else teach correlation and regression together at the end of the semester? Here is a treat for you: Updated data on Leonardo DiCaprio, his age, and his romantic partner's age when they started dating. A few years ago, there was a dust-up when a clever Redditor r/TrustLittleBrother realized that DiCaprio had never dated anyone over 25. I blogged about this when it happened. But the old data was from 2022. Inspired by this sleuthing,  I created a wee data set, including up-to-date information on his current relationship with Vittoria Ceretti, so your students can suss out the patterns that exist in this data.
Read more

Tyler Vigen's Spurious Correlations

Tyler Vigen has has created  a long list of easy-to-paste-into-a-powerpoint graphs that illustrate that correlation does not equal causation. For instance, while per capita consumption of cheese and number of people who die by become tangled in their bed sheets may have a strong relationship (r = 0.947091), no one is saying that cheese consumption leads to bed sheet-related death. Although, you could pose The Third Variable question to your students for some of these relationships). Property of Tyler Vigens, http://i.imgur.com/OfQYQW8.png Vigen has also provided a menu of frequently used variables (deaths by tripping, sunlight by state) to help you look for specific examples. This portion is interactive, as you and your students can generate your own graphs. Below, I generated a graph of marriage rates in Pennsylvania and consumption of high fructose corn syrup. Generated at http://www.tylervigen.com/
Read more