Two things I love to use when teaching stats are:
1) Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) visual abstracts. I've blogged about them before.
2) Useful tools to generate pretend data sets that mimic real data, and use those pretend data sets to teach. See: Richard Landers' and Andrew Luttrell's websites.
So, I was delighted when I saw this recently posted visual abstract about Ewing-Cobbs et al. (2026) research on using a specific CBT program to reduce stress in children following a traumatic physical injury.
| https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2848163 |
I have a new example of an independent t test for class. Yay! And I teach tons of future nurses/PAs, so it is doubly applicable.
However, the authors stated that the data wasn't immediately available. Also, once it is available, they (very reasonably) want to track their data sharing. Meaning that even if I could get their data, I shouldn't be sharing it on this blog.
I decided to create a dataset that mimics the findings. While I have other tools to do so (see above), I decided to try using GenAI this time. I figured that if I had more descriptive data, I could make a better fake dataset. I found the CIs (in yellow) for the data points in the tables:
"Hi! I would like you to create a data set for me. It should contain two variables, "ReSeT" and "Usual Care". The mean for ReSet should be 10.5, with a 95% CI of 8.1-12.9, and n = 44. The mean for Usual Care should be 14.7 with a 95% CI between 12.2 and 17.2, and n = 42. For the data you generate, every data point should be a whole number with no decimals."
After some fanagling (Copilot couldn't perfectly generate the data in the parameters I stated, but we got really close), I generated the data sets (Here is the .txt version, and here is the same data, in JASP format for my fellow JASP users/instructors)
How I will use it in class: Often, stats instructors structure their class so that students solve a mystery by analyzing data. That's great. But it is also nice to work backward: Show your students the visual abstract. Have them identify the IV, the DV, and the findings. THEN have them analyze data that, while not the real data, does mimic the main findings. It is sort of like giving them a road map. They know exactly where they are going, but they still need to analyze the data themselves. Needless to say, when I use data sets that I create, I ALWAYS tell my students that they aren't working with the actual data, but with data that mimics the real findings.
Comments
Post a Comment