Skip to main content

One sample t-tests, puppies, real data.

This teaching example:

1. Is psychology research.

2. Features the actual data from the generous and helpful Dr. Bray.

3. Features GIFs. EVERYTHING is better with GIFs.

4. Includes puppies.

5. Includes a good ol' Psych Statistics standard: The one-sample t-test.

Okay, get ready.

I first learned about Dr. Emily Bray's dog cognition research via Twitter. Never let it be said that good things don't happen on Twitter. Occasionally. 

This is such a helpful way to share your research. This example works for your Cognitive or RM classes as well as your stats class, since this thread illustrates not just her findings but her methods.

The thread also featured one-sample t-tests. Which, let's be honest, you don't find out in the wild very often despite the fact that they are almost always taught in Psychological Statistics.

 I'm especially fond of this example because it compares the sample data not to some value believed to be true (like "Is the average human body temperature really 98.6?"). Instead, it compares the data (proportion of successful trials for each puppy on each task) to what you would expect if there was no relationship at all: The dogs, given two options, would perform correctly on 50% of tasks. While the GIF only features a few of the tasks performed by the dogs, this table shows ALL of the one-sample t-tests you can choose from, in addition to the one illustrated in the previous tweet.



I emailed Dr. Bray and asked for the data so I could share it with you all, so your students can practice one-sample t-tests with real data. She kindly obliged (access it here).


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

If your students get the joke, they get statistics.

Gleaned from multiple sources (FB, Pinterest, Twitter, none of these belong to me, etc.). Remember, if your students can explain why a stats funny is funny, they are demonstrating statistical knowledge. I like to ask students to explain the humor in such examples for extra credit points (see below for an example from my FA14 final exam). Using xkcd.com for bonus points/assessing if students understand that correlation =/= causation What are the numerical thresholds for probability?  How does this refer to alpha? What type of error is being described, Type I or Type II? What measure of central tendency is being described? Dilbert: http://search.dilbert.com/comic/Kill%20Anyone Sampling, CLT http://foulmouthedbaker.com/2013/10/03/graphs-belong-on-cakes/ Because control vs. sample, standard deviations, normal curves. Also,"skewed" pun. If you go to the original website , the story behind this cakes has to do w...
1 comment
Read more