Hey. Most of you have never met me and only read my words on this blog, so I thought it would be fun to share a recording of a talk I gave at Murray State University in October of this year .  Not only do you get to see/hear me in action, I think this talk does a great job of summing up my approach to statistics and what I want my students to get out of my class. If you agree with my approach, may I gently suggest that you sign yourself up to get updates on  my forthcoming WW Norton Psychological Statistics textbook: https://seagull.wwnorton.com/l/710463/2023-10-26/2tp3nt

Spotify generates gobs of data about music.  Most people have seen the end-of-the-year data Spotify generates for each user about their listening patterns . Most people don't know that Spotify also generates a lot of data about individual songs. Some of it is straightforward: tempo, genre, length. However, Spotify also has its own niche way of quantifying songs: Danceability. Accousticness. Here is a whole list of their variables and descriptions from researchers at CMU:  https://www.stat.cmu.edu/capstoneresearch/315files_s23/team23.html What does this mean for a stats teacher? You have access to highly personalizable data sets, rooted in music, with gobs and gobs of variables for each song...or artist...or album...or year of release...or genre (like, so many ways to divide up your data).  For instance,  I created a data set with Spotify data for 1989 and 1989 (Taylor's Version) to teach paired  t -tests . How do Taylor's re-recordings compare to the originals?...

Ok, more Taylor Swift data for you. DID YOU KNOW that Spotify collects buckets and buckets of data about each and every song it provides (see:  https://www.spotify-song-stats.com/about ) So, I downloaded this information for 1989 and 1989 (Taylor's Version). So I could test for any differences between the recordings. Like, with data, not with my feelings and emotions. Specifically with a paired t -test. I get it. The sample sizes are very small. However, the data is still interesting. It makes sense that the tempo hasn't changed. Like, she did slow down or speed up anything. And that is super NS with an itty-bitty effect size. It is also interesting that acousticness has decreased. These are more heavily produced versions of the same songs (IMO), and while this change didn't achieve significance, it is a moderate effect size.  ANYWAY, you aren't really here for this information. You are here for data to share with your classes, yes? I'm here to help you teach your s...