I have written about the NFL's response to concussion data as a case study of how to obfuscate data. This has been covered in many places, including in The Atlantic and on PBS . In my experience, concussions are a prime source of conversation for traditionally college-aged students. Many of them were high school athletes. Fewer are college athletes. Most college students have personally experienced a concussion or loves someone who has. Now, the University of Pittsburgh is opening the National Sports Brain Bank . This is for athletes, not just football players. Two former Steelers have promised their brains, as have two scientists who played contact sports.  Here is a press release from the University of Pittsburgh . Here is a news report  featuring the two Steelers who have promised to donate their brains. However, as described by Aschwander, we still don't know how many football players have CTE (please read this piece, it is such good stats literacy from Aschwander...

Michael Hobbes shared a Tweet from Nick Gillespie. That Tweet was about an essay from The Bulwark . That Tweet plays fast and loose with Likert-type scale interpretation. The way Hobbes and his Twitter followers break down the issues with this headline provides a lesson on how to examine suspicious research clickbait that doesn't pass the sniff test. First off, who says "close to one in four"? And why are they evoking the attempt on Salman Rushdie's life, which did not happen on a college campus and is unrelated to high-profile campus protests of controversial speakers?  Hobbes dug into the survey cited in the Bulwark piece. The author of the Bulwark piece interpreted the data by collapsing across response options on a Likert-type response scale. Which can be done responsibly, I think. "Very satisfied" and "satisfied" are both happy customers, right? But this is suspicious. Other Twitter users questioned the question and how it may leave room for i...

This story by Christine Aschwanden  from 538.com  describes the limitations of a JAMA article.   That JAMA article describes a research project that found signs of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) in 110 out of 111 brains of former football players. How to use in stats and research methods: 1) It is research, y'all. 2) One of the big limitations of this paper comes from sampling. 3) The 538 article includes a number of thought experiments that grapple with the sampling distribution for all possible football players. 4) Possible measurement errors in CTE detection. 5) Discussion of replication using a longitudinal design and a control group. The research: The JAMA article details a study of 111 brains donated by the families deceased football players. They found evidence of CTE in 110 of the brains. Which sounds terrifying if you are a current football player, right? But does this actually mean that 110 out of 111 football players will develop CTE...

The Knot, a wedding planning website, collected data on the amount of money that brides and grooms spend on items for their weddings. They shared this information, as well as the average cost of a wedding in 2017. See the infographic below: BUT WAIT! If you dig into this data and the methodology, you'll find out that they only collected price points from couples who ACTUALLY PAID FOR THOSE ITEMS. https://xogroupinc.com/press-releases/the-knot-2017-real-weddings-study-wedding-spend/ Problems with this data to discuss with your students: 1) No one who got stuff for free/traded for stuff would have their $0 counted towards the average. For example, one of my cousins is a tattoo artist and he traded tattoos for use of a drone for photos of their outdoor wedding. 2) AND...if you didn't USE a service, your $0 wasn't added to their ol' mean value. For example, we had our wedding and reception at the same location, so we spent $0 on a ceremony site. 3) As poi...

I've shared these on my Twitter feed, and in a previous blog post dedicated to stats funnies. However,  I decided it would be useful to have a dedicated, occasionally updated blog post devoted to Twitter Statistics Comedy Gold. How to use in class? If your students get the joke, they get a stats concept. *Aside: I know I could have embedded these Tweets, but I decided to make my life easier by using screenshots. How NOT to write a response option.  Real life inter-rater reliability Scale Development Alright, technically not Twitter, but I am thrilled to make an exception for this clever, clever costume: This whole thread is awesome...https://twitter.com/EmpiricalDave/status/1067941351478710272 Randomness is tricky! And not random! ...