The thing about my way of teaching stats is that my cool, novel examples get old really fast. Like, pop culture is on a thirty-day cycle. Anyway, YEARS ago, 2014 to be exact, I blogged about illustrating bimodal data distributions using baby name data from the Social Security Administration. Specifically, when an older name comes back into vogue, it has a bimodal distribution when you plot time on the X axis. I stand by this example. However, all of the data illustrations come from 2014. When our traditionally aged college students were 6 or 7. Which makes this example feel a little stale. However, here is some data, courtesy of Redditor fevaah , showing old names that are back in vogue through 2025 ! And Eleanor, Violet, Nora, and Hazel are here, illustrating bimodal distributions for a new generation. If you used my old baby-name data, this is a quick, easy refresh for your lectures (or a fun new addition if you didn't). If this idea was help...
UPDATE: 2020 Data: https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-government When I explain chi-square at a conceptual, no-software, no-formula level, I use the example of gender distribution within the US Senate. There are 100 Senators, so the raw observed data count is the same as the observed data expressed via proportions. I think it makes it easier for junior statisticians to wrap their brains around chi-square. I usually start with an Goodness-of-Fit (or, as I like to call them, "One-sies chi-squares").For this example, I divide senators into two groups: men and women. And what do you get? For the 115th Congress, there are 23 women and 77 men . There is your observed data, both as a raw count or as a proportion. What is your expected data? A 50/50 breakdown...which would also be 50 men and 50 women. Without doing the actual analysis, it is pretty safe to assume that, due to the great difference between expected and observed values, your chi-square Goodness o...