Y'all. This is a statsy example featuring sensation and perception, developmental, and neuroscience.  The study found that post-partum, but not pregnant, women, saw faces where there were no faces (pareidolia illusion) . It is attributed to the endogenous oxytocin bump women experience after they have babies. Here is a link to Newsweek's treatment of the study and the actual study . Here are some examples of the photos used in the experiment. They are so dear because I see faces. I think my favorite is the clothes washer. Anyway, the researchers used pregnant women, post-partum women, and a control group and measured how often they saw faces. How to use 1. There is a good ol' Mann-Whitney U in this study. Making this the first ever Mann-Whitney U featured on the blog. 2. The researchers used OSF, and the data is available . 3. I like the growing trend of pairing newer and older data visualizations. Here, bar graphs and jitter plots are used to illustrate the same data, and...

This study, which found a link between maternal Tylenol usage during pregnancy and ADHD, has been making the rounds, particularly in the Academic Mama circles I move in. Being pregnant is hard. For just about every malady, the only solution is to stay hydrated. With a compromised bladder. But at least pregnant women have Tylenol for sore hips and bad backs. For a long time, this has been the only safe OTC pain reliever available to pregnant women. But a recent research article has cast doubt on this advice. A quick read of this article makes it sound like you are cursing your child with a lifetime of ADHD if you take Tylenol. A nd this article has become click-bait fodder. But these findings have some pretty big caveats.  Harris published this reaction piece at NPR . It is a good teaching example of media hype vs. incremental scientific progress and the third (or fourth or fifth) variable problem. It also touches on absolute vs. relative risk. NOTE: There are well-documente...

This story discusses the many levels of analysis required to get to the bottom of the hypothesis stated in the title of this story. For instance, are cigarettes or the patch better for mom? The baby? If the patch isn't great for either but still better than smoking, what sort of advice should a health care provider give to their patient who is struggling to quit smoking? What about animal model data? I think this story also opens up the conversation about how few medical interventions are tested on pregnant women (understandably so), and, as such,  researchers have to opt for more observational research studies when investigating medical interventions for protected populations.