The thing about my way of teaching stats is that my cool, novel examples get old really fast. Like, pop culture is on a thirty-day cycle. Anyway, YEARS ago, 2014 to be exact, I blogged about illustrating bimodal data distributions using baby name data from the Social Security Administration. Specifically, when an older name comes back into vogue, it has a bimodal distribution when you plot time on the X axis. I stand by this example. However, all of the data illustrations come from 2014. When our traditionally aged college students were 6 or 7. Which makes this example feel a little stale. However, here is some data, courtesy of Redditor fevaah , showing old names that are back in vogue through 2025 ! And Eleanor, Violet, Nora, and Hazel are here, illustrating bimodal distributions for a new generation. If you used my old baby-name data, this is a quick, easy refresh for your lectures (or a fun new addition if you didn't). If this idea was help...
This semester (SP 15), I taught an Honors section of Psychological Statistics for the first time. In this class, I decided to take my students to a minor league baseball game ( The Erie Seawolves , the Detroit Tiger's AA affiliate) in order to teach my students a bit about 1) applied statistics and data collection as well as 2) selecting the proper operationalized variable when answering a research question. Students prepared for the game day activity via a homework assignment they completed prior to the game. For this assignment, students learned about a few basic baseball statistics (batting average (AVG), slugging (SLG), and on-base plus slugging (OPS)). They looked up these statistics for a random Seawolves' player (based on 2014 data) and learned out to interpret these data points. They also read an opinion piece on why batting averages are not the most informative piece of data when trying to determine the merit of a given player. The opinion piece tied this exe...