It occurred to me that I haven't shared my absolute most precious professional development and stats teaching resource in the blog.  That resource is the Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Non-psychologists reading this post, don't stop now. Keep going.   1. There are multiple free e-books available from STP. Some are about teaching, broadly. Some of them have a chapter or two devoted to the teaching of statistics. But there is at least one exclusively devoted to the teaching of statistics,  For the Love of Teaching Undergraduate Statistics . I wrote a chapter in the book, so I'm partial.  2. The STP journal, Teaching of Statistics , includes pedagogy research about the teaching of statistics . Full disclosure: I'm a consulting editor at this journal. 3. If you are a member of STP and come up with an excellent teaching idea or study idea related to teaching statistics to psychology majors, STP has got some money for you . They have several grants, reviewed...

Emily Watson, writing for NPR, describes medical research by Ogilvie, vanNiekerk, & Krajden . This research provides a timely, topical example of false positives, false negatives, medical research, and gets your students thinking a bit more flexibly about measurement. This research provides valuable information about debate in medicine: What method of cervical cancer detection is most accurate: The traditional Pap smear, or an HPV screening? The Pap smear works by scraping cells off of a cervix and having a human view and detect abnormal cervical cancer cells. The HPV test, indeed, detects HPV. Since HPV causes 99% of cervical cancers, its presence signals a clinician to perform further screen, usually a colonoscopy. The findings: Women over 30 benefit more from the HPV test. How to use this example in class: - This is a great example of easy-to-follow  research methodology and efficacy testing in medicine. A question existed: Which is better, Pap or HPV test? The questi...

Patti Neighmond, reporting for NPR, wrote a piece on how the medical establishment's method for assessing patient pain is evolving . This is a good example of why it can be so tricky to operationalize the abstract. Here, the abstract notion in pain. And the story discusses shortcomings of the traditional numeric, Wong-Baker pain scale, as well as alternatives or complements to the pain scale. No one is vilifying the scale, but recent research suggests that what a patient reports and how a medical professional interprets that report are not necessarily the same thing. From Dr. John Markman's unpublished research: I think this could also be a good example of testing for construct validity. The researcher asked if the pain was tolerable and found out that their numerical scale was NOT detecting intolerable. This is a psychometric issue. One of the recommendations for better operationalization: Asking a patient how pain effects their ability to perform every day tas...

Jodi Cohen's story about research ethics violations, and the subsequent pulling of $3.1 million in grant funding , is a terrific case study that shows your students what can happen when research ethics are violated. It is also an excellent example of good, thorough science writing and investigative reporting. Short version of the story: UIC psychiatrist Mani Pavuluri was studying lithium in children. She was doing this on NIHM's dime. And she violated research protocols. The bullet points, copy and pasted out of Cohen's article, are a summary of the biggest ethical shortcomings of the study: So NIHM asked for their money back ($3.1 million) and the university and research are now being investigated by the government. This example also highlights that IRBs are NOT just some rubber stamp for researchers. They are in charge of enforcing federal rules for research. Another interesting fact: UIC tried to block ProPublica from publishing the story. This w...

The Ingrham, writing for The Washington Post, used data to investigate the claim that undocumented  immigrants are a large source of crime.  You may hit a paywall when you try to access this piece, FYI. Ingraham provides two pieces of evidence that suggest that undocumented immigrants are NOT a large source of crime. He draws on a  policy brief from the Cato Institute and a research study by Light and Miller  for his arguments. The Cato Institute policy brief   about illegal immigration and crime is actually part of a much larger study . It provides a nice conceptual example of a 3 (citizenship status: Native born, Undocumented Immigrant, Legal Immigrant) x 3 (Crime Type: All crimes, homicide, larceny) ANOVA. I also like that this data shows criminal conviction rates per 100K people, thus eliminating any base rate issues when comparing groups. From: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/19/two-charts-demolish-the-notion-that-i...

Writing for the Dallas News, Jackie Wang describes how data entry errors lead to the erroneous belief that Texas pregnancy related death rates were more than double the national rate. Short story: Texas thought it had terribly high rates of pregnancy related deaths. It didn't. Turns out that folks were just using the online system for reporting cause of death incorrectly. So, human data entry errors lead to what looked like a spike in maternal deaths. Like, whenever I make a change in my grade book columns in Blackboard, I always forget to hit "Save" and then the changes I make aren't saved. Only here, that sort of small error caused Texas to think that death rates for pregnancy complications was 14.6:100,000, not the reported 38.4:100,000. Which is an enormous difference. And a lot of money was spent to rectify the problem, which wasn't a problem, but those actions were probably still good for women and babies and families. This article details how Texas had ...

New York Magazine's  The Science of Us made a brief, funny video that investigates the long running issue of the dangers of double dipping.  It is based on a Scientific America report of an actual published research article  about double dipping. Yes, it includes the Seinfeld clip about George double dipping. The video provides a brief example of how to go about testing a research hypothesis by operationalizing a hypothesis, collecting, and analyzing data. Here, the abstract question is about how dirty it is to double dip. And they operationalized this question: Research design: The researchers used a design that, conceptually, demonstrates ANOVA logic (the original article contains an ANOVA, the video itself makes no mention of ANOVA). The factor is "Dips" and there are three levels of the factor: Before they double dipped, they took a base-line bacterial reading of each dip. Good science, that. They display the findings in table form (aga...

Organizations have frequently tried to shut down/manipulate data for their own ends. Big tobacco and lung cancer and addiction research . The National Football League and Chronic Traumatic Encephaly . And for the last 20 years, the National Rifle Association has successfully blocked funding for research investigating public safety and gun ownership. Essentially, the NRA has concentrated on eliminating funding at the CDC for research related to a better understanding of how guns hurt people. It started in 1996 with the Dickey Amendment and no one has been willing to fight to bring back funding. The APA wrote a piece on this in 2013 that summarizes the issue. In the wake of the shooting in Orlando, NPR did a story explaining how the American Medical Association is trying to change the rules governing gun research  and  the L.A. times published this column . I think this precedence is unfortunate from both sides of the gun debate. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania. I've...