I apologize in advance if you are pandemiced out. It is just that my brain won't stop seeing stats examples in information related to the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, researchers are looking back at the 1918 Flu Pandemic in order to forecast how social distancing (or lack thereof) will affect mortality rates now. And these patterns, as illustrated by National Geographic, demonstrate different data distribution shapes . The data comes from a reputable source, is scaled to deaths per 100,000 as to allow for comparison, and the distributions are related to very important data. Other lessons your students can learn from this data: This is what good scicomm looks like. Also, sometimes a good data visualization is better than an accurate-yet-filled-with-jargon version of the same information. For instance, much has been shared about NYC vs St. Louis in terms of timing of quarantine. Here is the comparison yet again, but in an easier-to-follow description: There is a ton of...

This interactive website from the BBC will match your student, using their height, gender, and weight, to their Rio Olympic body match. You enter your height, weight, age, and select your gender. It matches you with the athlete who is the most like you. It also provides good examples for distribution, and where you fall on the distribution, for Olympic athletes. I think it also gets students thinking about regression models. After you enter your data, the page returns information about where you fall on the distribution histogram for Olympic athletes by height, weight, and age for your gender. Then, the website returns your topic matches: How to use in class: 1) What other IVs could you collect to determine best sport match (DV)? Family income (I had access to soccer growing up, but not dressage horses)? Average temperature of hometown (My high school had a skiing club but not a beach volleyball club)? This gets your students thinking about multiple regression ...

This is a fun question perfect for that first or second chapter of every intro stats text. The part with data distributions. And it works for either the 1) beginning of the Fall semester and, therefore, football season or 2) the beginning of the Spring semester and, therefore, the lead-up to the Superbowl. Anyway,  Ben Jones   tweeted a few bar chart distributions that illustrate different descriptive statistics for NFL players. https://twitter.com/DataRemixed/status/1022553248375304193  He, kindly, provided the answers to his quiz. How to use it in class: 1) Bar graphs! 2) Data distributions and asking your students to logic their way through the correct answers...it makes sense that the data is skewed young. Also, it might surprise students that very high earners in the NFL are outliers among their peers. 3) Distribution shapes: Bimodal because of linebackers. Skewed because NFL players run young and have short careers. Normal data for height because even...

C ollin gleaned some archival data about ER visits in America from US Consumer Product Safety Commission. For each ER visit, there is a brief description of the reason for the visit. Collin queried punching related injuries. See his Method section below, which describes how he set the parameters for his operationalized variable. With a bit of explaining, you could also describe how Collin took qualitative data (the written description of the injury) and converted it into quantitative data: http://qz.com/582720/americas-most-prolific-wall-punchers-charted/ Then he made some charts. The age of wall punchers is right-skewed. And probably could be used in a Developmental Psychology class to illustrate poor judgment in adolescents as well as the emergence of the prefrontal cortex/executive thinking skills in one's early 20s. http://qz.com/582720/americas-most-prolific-wall-punchers-charted/ The author looked at wall punching by month of the year and uncovered a fairly un...

This interactive tool from Pew research illustrates left and right skew as well as median and longitudinal data. The x-axis indicates how politically consistent (as determined by a survey of political issues) self-identified republicans and democrats are across time. Press the button and you can animate data, or cut up the data so you only see one party or only the most politically active Americans. http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/section-1-growing-ideological-consistency/#interactive The data for both political part goes from being normally distributed in 1994 to skewed by 2014. And you can watch what happens to the median as the political winds change (and perhaps remind your students as to why mean would be the less desirable measure of central tendency for this example). I think it is interesting to see the relative unity in political thought (as demonstrated by more Republicans and Democrats indicating mixed political opinions) in the wake of 9/11 but more politicall...