The thing about my way of teaching stats is that my cool, novel examples get old really fast. Like, pop culture is on a thirty-day cycle. Anyway, YEARS ago, 2014 to be exact, I blogged about illustrating bimodal data distributions using baby name data from the Social Security Administration. Specifically, when an older name comes back into vogue, it has a bimodal distribution when you plot time on the X axis. I stand by this example. However, all of the data illustrations come from 2014. When our traditionally aged college students were 6 or 7. Which makes this example feel a little stale. However, here is some data, courtesy of Redditor fevaah , showing old names that are back in vogue through 2025 ! And Eleanor, Violet, Nora, and Hazel are here, illustrating bimodal distributions for a new generation. If you used my old baby-name data, this is a quick, easy refresh for your lectures (or a fun new addition if you didn't). If this idea was help...
This interactive website from the BBC will match your student, using their height, gender, and weight, to their Rio Olympic body match. You enter your height, weight, age, and select your gender. It matches you with the athlete who is the most like you. It also provides good examples for distribution, and where you fall on the distribution, for Olympic athletes. I think it also gets students thinking about regression models. After you enter your data, the page returns information about where you fall on the distribution histogram for Olympic athletes by height, weight, and age for your gender. Then, the website returns your topic matches: How to use in class: 1) What other IVs could you collect to determine best sport match (DV)? Family income (I had access to soccer growing up, but not dressage horses)? Average temperature of hometown (My high school had a skiing club but not a beach volleyball club)? This gets your students thinking about multiple regression ...