Skip to main content

Social Comparison Theory: T-test, ANOVA, and a very common way to trichotomize data.

Hey! 

I'm giving a keynote at the February annual teaching pre-conference at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology conference. It's all about social psychology stats example. Like this one! This one demonstrates social comparison theory without ever saying social comparison theory.
YouGov published data (here is the full data source) that asked participants to rate their own, close-other, and far-others on several factors related to modern life (see below). In doing so, they unknowingly trigger social comparison theory, and in particular, downward social comparison. TL;DR: We know ourselves and how well we are doing compared to other people. And people are motivated to feel good about themselves.  
 
https://today.yougov.com/society/articles/48400-americans-compare-own-outlook-with-country-poll



These findings smack of downward social comparison, right? Instead of having a specific target we are comparing ourself to, like a co-worker or a neighbor, if we are asked to compare ourselves to close others and far others, we tend to see 


I also think this can be a theoretical example of an ANOVA with a factor of judgment type and factors of self, close-other, and far-other. NOTE: I strongly believe in giving multiple, theory, software-free examples to my students. You never know which one will stick!

ANOTHER thing I see with this viz that we never talked about in graduate school (but I see all the time IRL) is the collapsing of levels Likert-type scales. Here is the original scale: 



In the data viz, YouGov collapsed across Excellent and Good. I bet they also cut up this data, collapsing against poor and terrible. It is just funny because, in graduate school, we would read articles about five-item scales versus seven-item scales and, like, sweat that choice, right? However, in multiple professional settings, we just collapse, creating a three-item scale. I get it: We are using this for fast data presentation purposes to quickly share descriptive data, not necessarily for analysis. But still. Dichotomizing (trichotomizing?) data gives me a knee-jerk bad feeling. 

If you want...you can also use this as a paired t-test example using different visualizations of the same data:



If you like this example, and would love to teach statistics using a whole textbook full of such examples, please sign up for the mailing list for my upcoming textbook, Statistics for Everyone!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...

Andy Field's Statistics Hell

Andy Field is a psychologist, statistician, and author. He created a funny, Dante's Inferno-themed  web site that contains everything you ever wanted to know about statistics. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Not another Dante's Inferno themed statistics web site!". But give this one a try. Property of Andy Field. I certainly can't take credit for this. Some highlights: 1) The aesthetic is priceless. For example, his intermediate statistics page begins with the introduction, "You will experience the bowel-evacuating effect of multiple regression, the bone-splintering power of ANOVA and the nose-hair pulling torment of factor analysis. Can you cope: I think not, mortal filth. Be warned, your brain will be placed in a jar of cerebral fluid and I will toy with it at my leisure." 2) It is all free. Including worksheets, data, etc. How amazing and generous. And, if you are feeling generous and feel the need to compensate him for the website, ...