Skip to main content

Wilson's "America’s Mood Map: An Interactive Guide to the United States of Attitude"

Here is a great example of several different topics, featuring an engaging, interactive map created by Time magazine AND using data from a Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article.

Essentially, the authors of the original article gave the Big Five personality scale to folks all over the US. They broke down the results by state. Then Time created an interactive map of the US in order to display the data.

http://time.com/7612/americas-mood-map-an-interactive-guide-to-the-united-states-of-attitude/

How to use in class:





1) The website is interactive in two ways:

a) It includes the short-form version of the Big Five scale. If you complete it, it returns both your results as well as the state that best matches your personality (I match with Indiana).

b) If you cursor over any state in the map, it presents you with the average score on each of the Big Five for that state. It also presents you with n-size for the sample used for that state as well how that state-ranked for each personality trait in comparison with all fifty states. This gives you a chance to review rank order and sample size as well as mean.



2) Turn this into an ANOVA example. Yes, the color-coding on the map suggests some regional differences, but do they actually pan out when one conducts an ANOVA? Below, I've provided neuroticism data by region so you can use it in class. It is coded such that 1 = West, 2 = South, 3 = Northeast, 4 = Midwest.

PS: Here is the data, with my regions added, in JASP, SPSS, Excel, and .CSV formats. 

Spoiler alert: It is statistically significant, but not all regions vary from all other regions. Additionally, there is some marginal significance in the post-hocs that you can discuss.


State Regions  Neuroticism
California 1 39.1
Nevada 1 44
Utah 1 30.4
Oregon 1 39.5
Washington 1 36.9
Idaho 1 44.2
Florida 2 40.8
Georgia 2 38
Alabama 2 48.7
Mississippi 2 52
Louisiana 2 60.4
Arkansas 2 56.2
Tennessee 2 49
Pennsylvania 3 61.4
New Jersey 3 56.4
New York 3 62.7
Connecticut 3 53.4
Massachusetts 3 63.8
Vermont 3 55.8
Illinois 4 51.2
Indiana 4 59.3
Iowa 4 49.1
Minnesota 4 43.4
Nebraska 4 41.6

5) If you want to ease your statistics babies into a fo' realz, peer-reviewed article after they play around with the pretty, interactive data, here is the original publication:

Rentfrow, P. J., Gosling, S. D., Jokela, M., Stillwell, D. J., Kosinski, M., & Potter, J. (2013). Divided we stand: Three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 996-1012.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Andy Field's Statistics Hell

Andy Field is a psychologist, statistician, and author. He created a funny, Dante's Inferno-themed  web site that contains everything you ever wanted to know about statistics. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Not another Dante's Inferno themed statistics web site!". But give this one a try. Property of Andy Field. I certainly can't take credit for this. Some highlights: 1) The aesthetic is priceless. For example, his intermediate statistics page begins with the introduction, "You will experience the bowel-evacuating effect of multiple regression, the bone-splintering power of ANOVA and the nose-hair pulling torment of factor analysis. Can you cope: I think not, mortal filth. Be warned, your brain will be placed in a jar of cerebral fluid and I will toy with it at my leisure." 2) It is all free. Including worksheets, data, etc. How amazing and generous. And, if you are feeling generous and feel the need to compensate him for the website, ...
Post a Comment
Read more