Skip to main content

Dr. Barry Marshall as an example of Type II error.

I just used this example in class, and I realized that I never shared it on my blog. I really love this example of Type II error (and some other stuff, too). So here it goes.

http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/mar1int-1


Type II errors. Missing something that is there. My favorite example of this is the story of Dr. Barry Marshall. I like it because it involves a hard-working scientist betting on himself and winning big and his big win has saved and improved countless lives. I also think that it is analogous to the replication crisis (which, in and of itself, seems to be highlighting instances of Type II error, eh?). Also, some correlations not equaling causation.

So, Barry Marshall. He is an Australian physician and researcher, and he studies stomachs. And he had plenty of patients with stomach ulcers, and he saw firsthand the suffering of his patients and death from ulcers and stomach cancer.

When Dr. Marshall was going through his medical training and the beginning of his medical career, the prevailing wisdom was that stress caused ulcers. And if you had ulcers, opportunistic bacteria called H. pylori would then prey upon the ulcer.

But this had never been proven. It was just widely accepted. But as your students should understand, correlation does not equal causation. At this point in the lecture, I ask my students to raise their hands if they experience stress. They all raise their hands. I then ask my students to raise their hands if they have a nose. I then try to argue that humans must have noses because of stress. Just because two things co-occur does not mean that one is causing the other.

Anyway, Dr. Marshall argued that the causal chain was all wrong and that H. pylori caused ulcers, not that H. pylori was attracted to pre-existing ulcers. This is huge. The original causal understanding would dictate that you should take yoga to cure ulcers. Dr. Marshall's causal link would argue that antibiotics could successfully treat ulcers. 

So he studied H. pylori. And he became increasingly convinced that the bacteria not only caused ulcers but also stomach cancer.

Dr. Marshall wanted to test his hypothesis, but animal modeling testing was challenging to conduct because H. pylori only live in primates (rats or mice would not do). And he didn't have those and couldn't afford those. Funding, amIrite? 

Dr. Marshall couldn't get permission for human trials, either. So he decided upon a case study. He ingested a broth containing one of his patient's H. Pylori cultures. And then he got ulcers. And then he did a bunch more research and was ignored for a long time by his peers. Still, he kept believing in himself and eventually...won a Nobel Prize for coming up with a new course of treatment that cures ulcers and has all but eliminated stomach cancer in the Western world. I know, right?

But he was almost resigned to the file drawer. He wasn't committing the Type II error, but the rest of medicine was because they weren't paying attention to his research or taking it seriously enough.

Anyway, I really, really get into telling this story. Because it is a great story. My students love it. The story is engaging in general but especially helpful as I teach many pre-PT, PA, OT, and nursing students.

Here are some articles written about Dr. Marshall, either for your own reading or maybe you could use them in class. They go into greater detail about how Dr. Marshall pieced together this mystery by carefully watching human patients who received antibiotics, not for their stomach problems, but other medical issues. At the same time, they happened to also have ulcers. It also highlights the role of Big Pharma and popular media picking up the story and running with it, so the antibiotic cure final got the attention it deserved:

http://discovermagazine.com/2010/mar/07-dr-drank-broth-gave-ulcer-solved-medical-mystery

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/when-scientists-experiment-on-themselves-h-pylori-and-ulcers/

https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2005/marshall-bio.html


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2661189/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...

Andy Field's Statistics Hell

Andy Field is a psychologist, statistician, and author. He created a funny, Dante's Inferno-themed  web site that contains everything you ever wanted to know about statistics. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Not another Dante's Inferno themed statistics web site!". But give this one a try. Property of Andy Field. I certainly can't take credit for this. Some highlights: 1) The aesthetic is priceless. For example, his intermediate statistics page begins with the introduction, "You will experience the bowel-evacuating effect of multiple regression, the bone-splintering power of ANOVA and the nose-hair pulling torment of factor analysis. Can you cope: I think not, mortal filth. Be warned, your brain will be placed in a jar of cerebral fluid and I will toy with it at my leisure." 2) It is all free. Including worksheets, data, etc. How amazing and generous. And, if you are feeling generous and feel the need to compensate him for the website, ...