Skip to main content

NYT's "Is It Safer to Visit a Coffee Shop or a Gym?"

Katherine BaickerOeindrila DubeSendhil MullainathanDevin Pope, and 

How to use this in class: 
 
1) Show your students how data can inform real-life problems. Or crises, like how to safely re-open stores during COVID-19.
2) Show your students how data can be used in creative ways to solve problems. The present argument uses cellphone location data.
3) Show your students data viz in real life: Here, scatterplots that really improve the #scicomm potential of this piece.
4) Show your students the research process of making an initial argument and then conducting a follow-up study to answer lingering questions.


1) Data to solve problems: This example demonstrates how data can be used in ways it was never intended to inform real-life issues. Here, cell phone location data is being used to create a sort of ratio that might provide guidance in the relative risk associated with different kinds of shopping and stores. 

NYT scatter plot highlighting the risk associated with sit-down restaurants.
And there is more to be gleaned from this data than is shared via the data visualization, data that argues that industry-wide recommendations may not accurately address the risk associated with different businesses within an industry:

Data discovers that not all restaurants are the same.
2) Novel data for novel problems: The authors gathered cell phone location data from before COVID-19. A good example of data mining. Here are their methods:

Research methods for article


3) The data is presented as a scatterplot+. Why the +? It is interactive in that you can cursor over the circles to see the source of the data. Also, circle size corresponds with the number of locations for a given business. I think that data visualization is a vital tool that helps to clarify and simplify complicated concepts. The use of scatterplots in this article improves communication.

4) Scientific thinking and follow-up studies: The authors realized that their original data looking at a) time spent and b) visits per week x square footage didn't take into account every way the disease spreads. Specifically, the virus can live for a long time on surfaces. As a follow-up study, the authors asked people to estimate a) their level of human interaction/touching of shared surfaces and b) how much of the visit was spent indoors or out of doors. This provides an excellent example of the iterative process of science. 
 
Graph displaying follow-up study: How much time is spent outside?






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...

Andy Field's Statistics Hell

Andy Field is a psychologist, statistician, and author. He created a funny, Dante's Inferno-themed  web site that contains everything you ever wanted to know about statistics. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Not another Dante's Inferno themed statistics web site!". But give this one a try. Property of Andy Field. I certainly can't take credit for this. Some highlights: 1) The aesthetic is priceless. For example, his intermediate statistics page begins with the introduction, "You will experience the bowel-evacuating effect of multiple regression, the bone-splintering power of ANOVA and the nose-hair pulling torment of factor analysis. Can you cope: I think not, mortal filth. Be warned, your brain will be placed in a jar of cerebral fluid and I will toy with it at my leisure." 2) It is all free. Including worksheets, data, etc. How amazing and generous. And, if you are feeling generous and feel the need to compensate him for the website, ...