Use recent gel nail:cancer headlines to discuss research design

Many of my students love a good manicure. Sometimes, they come in with full-on talons. The youth love manicures.

As such, the recent viral headlines about gel nail polish lamps and cancer matter to them.

Google search results, with over 52K hits for the search term gel nail cancer.

#scicomm

But what did the original research really study?

Headline reading: DNA damage and somatic mutations in mammalian cells after irradiation with a nail polish dryer

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-35876-8#Sec12

(CHECK OUT THIS GREAT RM IMAGE FROM THE ORIGINAL RESEARCH!!!)

This short NPR story by Rachel Treisman is a great summary. The NPR audio story is accompanied by a written report. In that report, Treisman succinctly summarizes the methodology:

A description of the methodology used in the gel nail study

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/26/1151332361/gel-nails-cancer-manicure-safe

1. Let's talk about science communication.

The NPR story is accurate science reporting. However, most of the headlines don't mention that a) some of the evidence came from mice cells, and they measured cell mutations but not cancer.

2. Let's talk about factorial ANOVA

The researchers used a 3 (cell types: human 1, human 2, and mouse cells) x 2 (exposure condition: acute vs chronic), outcome variables (cell death, mitochondrial damage, DNA damage).

3. Let's talk about repeated measure design.

In the acute condition, there were two sessions of 20 minutes, while in the chronic condition, the exposure occurred for days (again, see that fantastic image from the article!).

4. Let's talk about DVs

Some of the headlines say cancer, but the actual outcome measures cell death, DNA damage, and mitochondria damage.

5. Let's talk about using lab research to establish a basic premise

This wasn't a huge epidemiological study looking at actual cancer rates. It was nice, tidy lab research that used disembodied cells to study the first thing that must be established in the gel nail lamp:cancer argument. And that is the immediate effects of UV light on cells.

Comments

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr. Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales. 2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables. So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes: 1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales. 3) Daily check-in with your students. 1. Teach your students the basics...

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36). 2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film. 3. ...

Andy Field's Statistics Hell

Andy Field is a psychologist, statistician, and author. He created a funny, Dante's Inferno-themed web site that contains everything you ever wanted to know about statistics. I know, I know, you're thinking, "Not another Dante's Inferno themed statistics web site!". But give this one a try. Property of Andy Field. I certainly can't take credit for this. Some highlights: 1) The aesthetic is priceless. For example, his intermediate statistics page begins with the introduction, "You will experience the bowel-evacuating effect of multiple regression, the bone-splintering power of ANOVA and the nose-hair pulling torment of factor analysis. Can you cope: I think not, mortal filth. Be warned, your brain will be placed in a jar of cerebral fluid and I will toy with it at my leisure." 2) It is all free. Including worksheets, data, etc. How amazing and generous. And, if you are feeling generous and feel the need to compensate him for the website, ...

Search This Blog