The thing about my way of teaching stats is that my cool, novel examples get old really fast. Like, pop culture is on a thirty-day cycle. Anyway, YEARS ago, 2014 to be exact, I blogged about illustrating bimodal data distributions using baby name data from the Social Security Administration. Specifically, when an older name comes back into vogue, it has a bimodal distribution when you plot time on the X axis. I stand by this example. However, all of the data illustrations come from 2014. When our traditionally aged college students were 6 or 7. Which makes this example feel a little stale. However, here is some data, courtesy of Redditor fevaah , showing old names that are back in vogue through 2025 ! And Eleanor, Violet, Nora, and Hazel are here, illustrating bimodal distributions for a new generation. If you used my old baby-name data, this is a quick, easy refresh for your lectures (or a fun new addition if you didn't). If this idea was help...
First, a pun: American athlete Athing Mu broke the American record for the 800m. I guess you could say...that Mu is anything but average!! HAHAAAHAHAHHA. https://twitter.com/Notawful/status/1409456926497423363 Anyway. It is late June 2021, and my Twitter feed is filled with amazing athletes qualifying for the Olympics. Athletes like Sydney McLaughlin. That picture was taken after McLaughlin a) qualified for the 2021 Olympics AND b) broke the 400m hurdle world record. Which is amazing. Now, here is where I think we could explain effect size interpretation. How big was McLaughlin's lead over the previous record? From SpectrumNews1 McLaughlin broke the world record by less than a second. But she broke the world record so less than a second is a huge deal. Similarly, we may have Cohen's small-medium-large recommendations when interpreting effect sizes, but we always need to interpret an effect size within context. Does a small effect size finding explain more variance than any pre...