Skip to main content

UPDATE: The Knot's Infographic: The National Average Cost of a Wedding is $28,427

UPDATE:

The average cost of a wedding is now $33,391, as of 2017. Here is the most up to date infographic:



Otherwise, my main points from the original version of this survey are still the same:

1) To-be-weds surveyed for this data come were users of a website used to plan/discuss/squee about pending nuptials. So, this isn't a random survey.

2) If you look at the fine print for the survey, the average cost points quoted come from people who paid for a given service. So, if you didn't have a reception band ($0 spent) your data wasn't used to create the average. Which probably leads to inflation of all of these numbers.

_________________________________________
Original Post:

This infographic describes the costs associated with an "average" wedding. It is a good example non-representative sampling and bending the truth via lies of omission. For the social psychologists in the crowd, this may also provide a good example of persuasion by establishing a norm (here, a wedding vendor website establishing the norm of an expensive wedding).

From TheKnot.com


1) This data came from TheKnot.com, a website dedicated to wedding planning. The web site makes money via wedding vendor adverting. Survey participants were TheKnot users. So, the survey participants 1) have internet access and 2) time/inclination to spend online looking at wedding ideas and 3) enjoy posting to wedding message boards. Hardly a representative sample, despite the large n-size.

A bit of evidence for a non-representative sample comes from basic demographic data available for the survey. The survey press release states that the average age of bride was 29 and the groom was 31. Census data states that the US, the average age for a bride is 26.6 and the groom is 28.6, indicating that this sample may be coming from more established adults (with deeper pockets).

2) According to the methodology for this survey, this data is based upon individuals who paid a professional for the services provided. If you had a friend provide a service for free (for example, my Aunt, a minister, kindly officiated our wedding for free and friends who are musicians provided music for the service), your data point of $0 would not be included in this data. Likewise, if you didn't hire a limo or a videographer, your data point of $0 would not be included in this data.

3) As a social psychologist, I would also use this as an example of a merchant attempting to establish some very expensive social norms for people planning weddings.

Finally, if you go to the original data linked above, they do detail how wedding costs typically reflect the cost of living for a region (so, perhaps regional data would better reflect on a true average, another discussion point for your students).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ways to use funny meme scales in your stats classes

Have you ever heard of the theory that there are multiple people worldwide thinking about the same novel thing at the same time? It is the multiple discovery hypothesis of invention . Like, multiple great minds around the world were working on calculus at the same time. Well, I think a bunch of super-duper psychology professors were all thinking about scale memes and pedagogy at the same time. Clearly, this is just as impressive as calculus. Who were some of these great minds? 1) Dr.  Molly Metz maintains a curated list of hilarious "How you doing?" scales.  2) Dr. Esther Lindenström posted about using these scales as student check-ins. 3) I was working on a blog post about using such scales to teach the basics of variables.  So, I decided to create a post about three ways to use these scales in your stats classes:  1) Teaching the basics of variables. 2) Nominal vs. ordinal scales.  3) Daily check-in with your students.  1. Teach your students the basics...

Using pulse rates to determine the scariest of scary movies

  The Science of Scare project, conducted by MoneySuperMarket.com, recorded heart rates in participants watching fifty horror movies to determine the scariest of scary movies. Below is a screenshot of the original variables and data for 12 of the 50 movies provided by MoneySuperMarket.com: https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ https://www.moneysupermarket.com/broadband/features/science-of-scare/ Here is my version of the data in Excel format . It includes the original data plus four additional columns (so you can run more analyses on the data): -Year of Release -Rotten Tomato rating -Does this movie have a sequel (yes or no)? -Is this movie a sequel (yes or no)? Here are some ways you could use this in class: 1. Correlation : Rotten Tomato rating does not correlate with the overall scare score ( r = 0.13, p = 0.36).   2. Within-subject research design : Baseline, average, and maximum heart rates are reported for each film.   3. ...

If your students get the joke, they get statistics.

Gleaned from multiple sources (FB, Pinterest, Twitter, none of these belong to me, etc.). Remember, if your students can explain why a stats funny is funny, they are demonstrating statistical knowledge. I like to ask students to explain the humor in such examples for extra credit points (see below for an example from my FA14 final exam). Using xkcd.com for bonus points/assessing if students understand that correlation =/= causation What are the numerical thresholds for probability?  How does this refer to alpha? What type of error is being described, Type I or Type II? What measure of central tendency is being described? Dilbert: http://search.dilbert.com/comic/Kill%20Anyone Sampling, CLT http://foulmouthedbaker.com/2013/10/03/graphs-belong-on-cakes/ Because control vs. sample, standard deviations, normal curves. Also,"skewed" pun. If you go to the original website , the story behind this cakes has to do w...